A kiln is essentially a box with some form of heating inside it - in this case electric elements - to heat up the pots in it to a high enough temperature. The elements get up to a certain temperature (typically about 1400°C) and, if perfectly insulated, the kiln and its contents would get up to the same temperature as the elements. Simple!
Unfortunately the perfectly insulated kiln doesn't exist. As the insulation heats up, heat travels to the outside of the kiln, and then heat is lost from the kiln in warming up the surrounding air. This means that the rate of heat rise will slow down as the outside of the kiln gets warmer, and ultimately the rate of heat loss will match the heat put in by the elements, and the kiln won't get any hotter. Even before the kiln stops heating up, the rate of temperature rise may slow down to a point where it is longer than we are prepared to wait, so we may upgrade to better insulation or more powerful elements.
Also, the heat from the elements is absorbed by the pots and kiln furniture, as well as the outer insulation, and the more there is to heat up, the longer it takes. If we switch back to the perfectly insulated kiln, any kiln load will eventually get to the desired temperature, but it may take a long time to get there, so to fire a bigger load we need more powerful elements.
For a simple kiln shape, and constant insulation, we can assume the outside gets to about the same temperature all over. This means that the heat loss is due to the temperature difference between the outside air and the kiln surface, and the outside area of the kiln. This means that, in terms of kiln shape, a sphere is ideal as it has the lowest ratio of area to volume, of 4.835976.
Unfortunately spherical kilns haven't caught on. Instead, kiln makers use cylindrical shapes for top loaders, and cuboid for front loaders.
For a cylindrical kiln, the most energy efficient ratio is when the diameter is the same as the height, with a ratio of about 5.54, so about 15% more heat loss. If we go to a width:height ratio of 0.5 or 2.0 the heat loss rises to 21% more than a sphere.
For a front loader, the most efficient shape is a cube, with a ratio of 6, so 24% less efficient than a sphere. Again, the further we go from this ideal, the less efficient the shape becomes. For example, if we went for sides of 2 x 1 x 0.5 then the efficiency is 54% less.
There may be good reasons to go away from the ideal ratio, such as not making a top loader too tall to reach down in to, but you need to be aware of the accompanying loss of efficiency
There are a number of approaches<HR>
Tim Thornton Ceramics Technical by Tim Thornton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://tim-thornton.com/tikiwiki/tiki-index.php?page=Licence.
If you re-use any material from this web site, you must include an attribution statement as described in the licence, and state if the work has been altered.
You may release work that modifies or builds upon this work only under the same licence (or a compatable one, as defined in the licence).
This licence does not permit you to use this work for commercial purposes, i.e. for commercial advantage or monetary gain. If you wish to use the work in this way, please contact us to discuss it. You will need our prior permission and approval to do this.
Whilst we aim to ensure that all material is accurate at the time of publication, we do not accept responsibility for decisions based on information we make available. No content of this site may be taken to be legal or medical advice.
Please bear in mind that materials on the website are the most up to date versions, but items you have downloaded in the past may not be. The materials are updated from time to time. We recommend that you use the latest versions by referring to those published on our website.
Images – Images are not available for re use under the OGL because in most cases copyright is held by a third party. The Council does not grant anyone any rights to re use images.
Use of logos – The use of Tim Thornton’s logos on any document or in association with any information, signifies that the document or information has been prepared or approved by him. The logos are to be used only when reproducing materials unaltered from the web site, to show their original source. If you wish to use the logo in any other way, please contact us first to obtain permission.
Third party intellectual property/copyright – We do not have the legal authority to grant permission to re use documents where legal rights are owned by third parties.
If you wish to make a specific application to re use information which does not conform with the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence terms, please contact us to ask permission and for details of what, if any, additional conditions and/or charges may apply. Your application should be in writing, specifying your name and address and, identifying the information source you want to re-use and the purpose for re-use.
Whilst every care has been taken in the compilation of this website, and every attempt made to present up-to-date and accurate information, we cannot guarantee that inaccuracies will not occur. We will not be held responsible for any loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of any inaccuracy or error within these pages.
Links from our site may lead to pages maintained by other organisations. These are provided purely for your convenience, and do not imply that we endorse or support those organisations, the information on their pages, or their products or services in any way. Additionally, no responsibility is assumed by us for the contents of its pages.